🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". A law may be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to approve a bill raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic statement supporting a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age limit is a useful starting point," stated a leading MEP behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced concerns. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a teenager who died after encountering harmful social media material argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly unfolding at the regional government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring parental consent for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from various individuals to copy Australia's path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries show that states internationally are increasingly content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.